Parallels bridged network wifi
For my example, let me point out a case where a fiscally conservative view can contradict a socially conservative one: military spending. That’s too simplistic in understanding our core motivations. Feeling one way about X doesn’t mean one has to (or should) feel the same way about Y. There may be some correlations between some variables doesn’t mean it’s meaningless to distinguish between them. is meaningless if you’re fiscally conservative. However, “not socially progressive” doesn’t mean “pro-life, anti-gay, racist”. Maybe he was just exaggerating, I don’t know, but it certainly seems to detract from his message. His own example clearly and bluntly states that anyone who claims to be fiscal conservatives while also claiming to be socially liberal like pro-choice, supportive of gay rights, or not being racist is “wrong”. īut we don’t have to wonder what he’s implying because he says it expressly: “You can’t separate fiscal issues from social issues.”. It’s not an easy thing for people to navigate and I doubt many of those who love to criticize from the outside would do any better.Īgain, I don’t think the author implies that. Yes, we do have a lot of stupid people in our population of 321+ million, but we also have a lot of people who do care and make an effort to see through the mud that is American politics and the manipulating American media. Lastly, it’s par for the course to criticize the American public. There’s a reason all the fantastic promises we hear every election cycle never come to fruition. He/she has power in limited capacity and functions in large part as a figurehead. I like Sanders but the POTUS doesn’t run the show here. Even in the event that Sanders were to become our next president, he simply doesn’t have the power to deliver on all his great ideas (and I don’t say that with sarcasm). Trump election… That’s not going to happen. We’re served speculation 24/7 and it’s all worthless shit.Īs far as having a Sanders vs. The only thing they’re telling of is the medias lack of reporting on anything important & relevant such as Paul Ryan attaching, at the last minute, the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 to the budget bill that had to be passed or else. Any polls you’re looking at now serve only to fuel gossip. Upsets aren’t an oddity in American politics. History is riddled with outcomes that contradict polling, even when the finish line is relatively near. The polls aren’t both meaningless and telling at the same time. Right now, every single poll has Sanders beating trump by landslides – in fact, Sanders beats him by far larger margins than Clinton does! Of course, polls are effectively meaningless this far out, but it’s quite telling nonetheless.